Sunday, 24 May 2020

India activists held over citizenship law protest : Sanjay Patil

SHARE
Devangana Kalita at a Pinjra Tod protest
Devangana Kalita is one of the founding members of the Pinjra Tod movement in India

Sanjay Patil  :  Delhi : Nagpur Press Media : BBC : 25 May 2020 :  Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita took part in a sit-in against a contentious citizenship law a day before deadly riots broke out.
They are among several activists who have been arrested since India's lockdown began on 25 March.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has been accused of using the pandemic to crack down on dissent.
Ms Narwal and Ms Kalita, both in their early 30s, have been remanded to custody for two days.
They are founding members of Pinjra Tod, a popular student movement to enable women to reclaim public spaces.
In a statement, the organisation said the women are facing charges of attempt to murder, criminal conspiracy and obstructing public officials.



Pregnant student Safoora Zargar at risk in jail

In April, police had arrested another student activist, 27-year-old Safoora Zargar. She had been active in organising peaceful protests against India's Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), which critics say discriminates against Muslims.
The law sparked massive protests across India - both Hindu and Muslim protesters said the law violated India's secular values and was unconstitutional.
But one of these protests in north-east Delhi - the sit-in which Ms Narwal and Ms Kalita attended - sparked a political rally in favour of the law the following day.
Later that day, minor clashes were reported between Hindus and Muslims. But the situation escalated and soon turned into deadly riots that killed 53 people, mostly Muslims.
In recent months, police have also arrested Meeran Haider, a research scholar and member of the Jamia Coordination Committee, Shifa-Ur-Rehman, president of the Jamia Millia Islamia Alumni Association, Gulfisha, an MBA student, and Ishrat Jahan, a former municipal councillor, for participating in protests against the citizenship law.
The arrests have been condemned by civil society and rights groups who have called them "illegal" and a "grave abuse of state power"

Court grants activists bail saying they were only protesting, police arrest them again

a couple of people posing for the camera

A day after a team from Northeast Delhi’s Jafrabad police station arrested two members of Pinjra Tod, a women’s student organisation, in connection with their alleged role in the anti-CAA Jafrabad sit-in protest in February this year, a Delhi court granted them bail, saying that IPC Section 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) invoked against them was “not maintainable”, and that they were “merely protesting against NRC and CAA”.

The respite, though, was short lived as a Special Investigation Team of the Crime Branch arrested them under charges of murder, attempt to murder, rioting and criminal conspiracy, and sought their police custody for 14 days. The court eventually remanded them in two-day police custody.
The respite, though, was short lived as a Special Investigation Team of the Crime Branch arrested them under charges of murder, attempt to murder, rioting and criminal conspiracy, and sought their police custody for 14 days. The court eventually remanded them in two-day police custody.
The team from Jafrabad police station arrested them under IPC sections 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions) and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty).
However, granting them bail on Sunday, Duty Magistrate Ajeet Narayan stated that “from the perusal of FIR and case file, prima facie the offence under section 353 is not maintainable”.
“Facts of the case reveal that the accused were merely protesting against the NRC and CAA and the accused did not indulge in any violence. Also, the accused have strong roots in society and are well-educated. Accused are ready to cooperate with the police regarding the investigation,” the order stated.
“Also, considering the situation that the accused are vulnerable to the current pandemic of Covid-19, this court is not inclined to give PC remand of the accused and application of police remand is declined,” it added.
In the meantime, the Crime Branch investigation officer (IO) Kuldeep Singh moved an application before the court, seeking to interrogate the two women.
The Duty Magistrate noted in his order: “Both the accused are arrested in case FIR No. 48/20 PS Jafrabad by IO Ram Meher Singh, SHO PS Jafrabad. Both the accused has (sic) disclosed their involvement in present case also. They are also named in the disclosure statement of co-accused persons arrested in present case. Applicant is allowed and permission is granted to interrogate the accused for 15 minutes and also formal arrest of the accused if necessary.”
After 15 minutes, IO Kuldeep Singh “produced both accused after arrest”. “Application for PC remand for 14 days was moved by Inspector Kuldeep Singh. IO has submitted that the accused have to be thoroughly interrogated at length to know the conspiracy behind the incidents and the identity of the co-accused has to be established and PC remand is necessary to arrest the co-accused,” the Duty Magistrate noted.
Adit S Pujari, Tusharika Mattoo and Kunal Negi, counsel for the accused, opposed the police application, saying Kalita and Narwal have been implicated in the case malafidely.
“Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the initial stage of the investigation, both the accused remanded to two days’ police custody,” the Duty Magistrate said.
While Kalita is an MPhil student at JNU’s Centre for Women’s Studies, Narwal is a PhD student at the Centre for Historical Studies. They are both founding members of Pinjra Tod, formed in 2015, primarily in opposition to hostel curfews at Delhi’s colleges and universities. Kalita and Narwal have done their graduation from DU’s Miranda House and Hindu College, respectively.
In a statement, the JNU Teachers’ Association said, “The stark mismatch between the pattern of the arrests by the Delhi Police and that of the violence as recorded by several independent fact finding teams, and the steady refusal of the police to take any substantive action against those who had been repeatedly caught by TV cameras spewing hatred and urging violence before the riots broke out, points clearly to the fact that the Delhi Police is conducting a witch hunt of those whose only crime was to be part of a democratic opposition to something they consider to be anti-Constitutional.”
The JNU Students’ Union said in a statement: “The Delhi Police has never displayed the same alacrity in arresting Kapil Mishra or his ilk in connection with the violence… By arresting two women activists now… the police is now clearly demonstrating that basic courtesies and the rule of law have been replaced by brute force.”
SHARE

Author: verified_user

I AM POST GRADUATED FROM THE NAGPUR UNIVERSITY IN JOURNALISM

0 comments: