Friday, 13 March 2020

тАШTransport Nagar landтАЩ HC directs NMRDA to  take complete action : Sanjay Patil

‘Transport Nagar land’ HC directs NMRDA to take complete action : Sanjay Patil

Image result for justice amit b borkar

Sanjay Patil  : Nagpur : Justice R K Deshpande and Justice Amit B Borkar at the High Court here have directed the Nagpur Metropolitan Region Development Authority (NMRDA) to continue with the process of action against unauthorised development on proposed ‘Transport Nagar’ and take the same to its logical end within 8 weeks in accordance with law. The court took cognisance of the fact that since March 4, 2017, the 100 acres out of 383.14 acres of land for proposed ‘Transport Nagar’ in possession of, and owned by, Maa Umiya Audyogik Sahakari Vasahat Maryadit, fell within the jurisdiction of NMRDA. Already, NMRDA has issued notices under Section 53 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act to 105 occupants in the area.
The court disposed of the PIL filed by social activist Anil M Wadpalliwar with this direction to NMRDA, stating that except this direction, it did not find that ‘any other further order’ could be passed in this petition. The direction by the High Court related to the prayer made in the petition for direction to the respondents to remove or demolish unauthorised develpoment made by the respondent-society without obtaining appropriate permission. In this context, the court noted that Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT) had already made a police complaint for registration of offences. District Collector-Nagpur informed the court that on October 23, 1997, NIT had passed a resolution for establishing Transport Plaza and Industrial Estate and an advertisement was published inviting offers.
The respondent-society was one of those who made the offer of the land in question for establishing the said plaza. NIT had granted approval. The society was requested to change the user of the land from agriculture to industrial and transportaion. According to the court, the main complaint in the PIL was that the respondent-society practiced a fraud in getting the sale deeds executed from various agriculturists by representing to them that their lands were required for the project of NIT and thus induced them to sell the land to it, though no such project was established. The court stated that it was not possible for it to entertain the dispute in respect of registered sale deeds said to have been executed by various agriculturists in favour of the said society in collusion with NIT.
The court indicated that it left this question to be agitated by the person concerned in the appropriate proceedings and for the purpose of this PIL, “we consider the Society to be the owner of the Property”. According to NIT, though willingness was shown to have an agreement with NIT, in respect of construction of Transport Nagar, the society never took any step to get the agreement executed and at no point of time any agreement was entered into between NIT and the society for this project. The High Court pointed out that in view of rejection of petitions against reservation of land in the Develpment Plan for Transport Plaza by the High Court and the Supreme Court in the past again and again, it was, therefore, not possible for the court to reopen the issue of legality or otherwise of the reservation marked as ‘Modification M-5’ in the Development Plan under the notification brought into force with effect from July 15, 2000. Adv S P Bhandarkar appeared for the petitioner. Additional GP S M Uke (State), Advocates R O Chhabra (NIT and NMRDA), and Uday Dastane and M U Dastane (Society) represented the respondents.

Thursday, 12 March 2020

рд╢рд┐рд╡рд╕реЗрдиреЗрд▓рд╛ рдлрд╕рд╡рд┐рд▓реЗ рд╣реА рдЖрдордЪреА рдЪреВрдХрдЪ : рднрд╛рдЬрдкрдЪреЗ рдиреЗрддреЗ рд╕реБрдзреАрд░ рдореБрдирдЧрдВрдЯреАрд╡рд╛рд░ рдпрд╛рдВрдЪреА рдХрдмреБрд▓реА :рд╕рдВрдЬрдп рдкрд╛рдЯреАрд▓

рд╢िрд╡рд╕ेрдиेрд▓ा рдлрд╕рд╡िрд▓े рд╣ी рдЖрдордЪी рдЪूрдХрдЪ : рднाрдЬрдкрдЪे рдиेрддे рд╕ुрдзीрд░ рдоुрдирдЧंрдЯीрд╡ाрд░ рдпांрдЪी рдХрдмुрд▓ी :рд╕ंрдЬрдп рдкाрдЯीрд▓

Image result for mungattiwar

рд╕ंрдЬрдп рдкाрдЯीрд▓ : рд░ाрдЬ्рдпाрддीрд▓ рд╢िрд╡рд╕ेрдиा- рднाрдЬрдк рдпुрддी рдиेрдордХी рдХрд╢ाрдоुрд│े рддुрдЯрд▓ी, рдХोрдгी рдХोрдгाрд╕ рдлрд╕рд╡िрд▓े рдпाрдмाрдмрдд рдЧेрд▓्рдпा рдХाрд╣ी рдорд╣िрди्рдпांрдкाрд╕ूрди рд╕ुрд░ू рдЕрд╕рд▓ेрд▓्рдпा рдЪрд░्рдЪेрд▓ा рдЕрдЦेрд░ рдЧुрд░ुрд╡ाрд░ी рд╡िрдзाрдирд╕рднेрдд рдкूрд░्рдгрд╡िрд░ाрдо рдоिрд│ाрд▓ा. рд╣ोрдп, рдЖрдо्рд╣ी рд╢िрд╡рд╕ेрдиेрд▓ा рдлрд╕рд╡िрд▓े. рдХрдзी рдиा рдХрдзी рдЖрдо्рд╣ी рд╣ी рдЪूрдХ рд╕ुрдзाрд░ू, рдЕрд╢ा рд╢рдм्рджाрдд рднाрдЬрдкाрдЪे рдЬ्рдпेрд╖्рда рдиेрддे рд╕ुрдзीрд░ рдоुрдирдЧंрдЯीрд╡ाрд░ рдпांрдиी рдпुрддीрдд рдХोрдгी рдХोрдгाрд▓ा рдлрд╕рд╡िрд▓े рдпाрдЪी рд╕्рдкрд╖्рдЯ рдХрдмुрд▓ी рджिрд▓ी.
рдЖрдордЪ्рдпा рдЪुрдХीрдЪा рддुрдо्рд╣ी рдПрд╡рдвा рдлाрдпрджा рдЙрдЪрд▓ू рдирдХा. рд░ाрдЬ्рдпाрддрд╣ी рдХोрдгी рдиा рдХोрдгी рдЬ्рдпोрддिрд░ाрджिрдд्рдп рд╢िंрджे рдиिрд░्рдоाрдг рд╣ोрдИрд▓рдЪ рдЕрд╕े рд╕ांрдЧрдд рдХाँрдЧ्рд░ेрд╕- рд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░рд╡ाрджीрд▓ा рд╕ाрд╡рдзाрдирддेрдЪा рдЗрд╢ाрд░ा рджिрд▓ा.
рд▓ोрдХрд╕рднा рдиिрд╡рдбрдгुрдХीрдд рдпुрддी рдХрд░рддाрдиा рд╢िрд╡рд╕ेрдиा рдкрдХ्рд╖рдк्рд░рдоुрдЦ рдЙрдж्рдзрд╡ рдаाрдХрд░े, рднाрдЬрдкा рд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░ीрдп рдЕрдз्рдпрдХ्рд╖ рдЕрдоिрдд рд╢рд╣ा рдЖрдгि рддрдд्рдХाрд▓ीрди рдоुрдЦ्рдпрдоंрдд्рд░ी рджेрд╡ेंрдж्рд░ рдлрдбрдгрд╡ीрд╕ рдпांрдЪ्рдпाрдд рдЪрд░्рдЪा рдЭाрд▓ी рд╣ोрддी. рдпा рдмैрдардХीрдд рд╡िрдзाрдирд╕рднा рдиिрд╡рдбрдгुрдХीрдЪ्рдпा рдпुрддीрдмाрдмрдд рдЖрдгि рдоुрдЦ्рдпрдоंрдд्рд░िрдкрджाрдмाрдмрддрд╣ी рдЪрд░्рдЪा рдЭाрд▓ी рд╣ोрддी. рдоाрдд्рд░ рд╡िрдзाрдирд╕рднा рдиिрд╡рдбрдгुрдХीрдиंрддрд░ рдоुрдЦ्рдпрдоंрдд्рд░िрдкрджाрд╡рд░ूрди рджोрди्рд╣ी рдкрдХ्рд╖ाрдд рджाрд╡े-рдк्рд░рддिрджाрд╡े рд╕ुрд░ू рдЭाрд▓े. рдоुрдЦ्рдпрдоंрдд्рд░िрдкрдж рдЕрдбीрдЪ рд╡рд░्рд╖े рджेрдг्рдпाрдЪा рд╢рдм्рдж рднाрдЬрдк рдиेрдд्рдпांрдиी рджिрд▓्рдпाрдЪा рджाрд╡ा рдЙрдж्рдзрд╡ рдаाрдХрд░े рд╡ाрд░ंрд╡ाрд░ рдХрд░ीрдд рд╣ोрддे, рддрд░ рдоुрдЦ्рдпрдоंрдд्рд░िрдкрдж рдЕрдбीрдЪ рд╡рд░्рд╖े рджेрдг्рдпाрдЪा рд╢рдм्рдж рджिрд▓ा рдирд╡्рд╣рддा рдЕрд╕े рд╕ांрдЧрдд рдлрдбрдгрд╡ीрд╕ рдпांрдиी рд╢िрд╡рд╕ेрдиेрд▓ा рдЦोрдЯं рдкाрдбрдг्рдпाрдЪा рдк्рд░рдпрдд्рди рдХेрд▓ा рд╣ोрддा.
рдоुрдЦ्рдпрдоंрдд्рд░िрдкрджाрд╡рд░ूрди рдпुрддी рддुрдЯрд▓्рдпाрдиंрддрд░рд╣ी рджोрди्рд╣ी рдкрдХ्рд╖ рдПрдХрдоेрдХांрд╡рд░ рдлрд╕рд╡рдгुрдХीрдЪा рдЖрд░ोрдк рдХрд░ीрдд рд╣ोрддे. рдоाрдд्рд░ рдЕрд░्рдерд╕ंрдХрд▓्рдкाрд╡рд░ीрд▓ рдЪрд░्рдЪेрджрд░рдо्рдпाрди рднाрдЬрдкрдЪे рдЬ्рдпेрд╖्рда рдиेрддे рд╕ुрдзीрд░ рдоुрдирдЧंрдЯीрд╡ाрд░ рдпांрдиी рдпाрдЪा рдЦुрд▓ाрд╕ा рдХेрд▓ा.
рднाрдХीрдд..  рдЖрдо्рд╣ी рд╢िрд╡рд╕ेрдиेрд▓ा рдлрд╕рд╡िрд▓े, рдкрдг рддुрдо्рд╣ी рдпाрдЪा рдПрд╡рдвा рдЧैрд░рдлाрдпрджा рдШेрдК рдирдХा рдЕрд╕े рдд्рдпांрдиी рд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░рд╡ाрджी- рдХाँрдЧ्рд░ेрд╕рд▓ा рд╕ुрдиाрд╡рд▓े. рдПрд╡рдвेрдЪ рдирд╡्рд╣े рддрд░ рддुрдордЪे рддीрди рдорд╣िрди्рдпाрдкाрд╕ूрдирдЪे рд╕ंрдмंрдз рдЕрд╕ूрди рдЖрдордЪे рейреж рд╡рд░्рд╖ांрдЪे рд╕ंрдмंрдз рдЕрд╕ूрди рдорд╣ाрд╡िрдХाрд╕ рдЖрдШाрдбी рд╕рд░рдХाрд░рдЪे рдЖрддा резрежреж рджिрд╡рд╕ рдкूрд░्рдг рдЭाрд▓े рдЖрд╣ेрдд. рдпा рд╕рд░рдХाрд░рдЪे резрежреж рдЕрдкрд░ाрдз рдкूрд░्рдг рдЭाрд▓्рдпाрдиंрддрд░ рд╣े рд╕рд░рдХाрд░ рдХोрд╕рд│ेрд▓, рдЕрд╕े рднाрдХीрддрд╣ी рдд्рдпांрдиी рдпाрд╡ेрд│ी рд╡рд░्рддрд╡िрд▓े.
Sexual harassment at workplace is affront to rights of woman: SC: Sanjay Patil

Sexual harassment at workplace is affront to rights of woman: SC: Sanjay Patil


Image result for sexual harassment of women
Sanjay Patil : Nagpur : SEXUAL harassment at the workplace is an “affront” to the fundamental rights of a woman to equality, her right to live with dignity and to practice any profession or carry out any occupation, the Supreme Court has said. The apex court observed this while upholding the verdict of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which had quashed an order of transfer of a woman bank employee who had levelled allegations of sexual harassment against her senior officer. A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and Ajay Rastogi said the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 was enacted to provide protection against sexual harassment of women at the workplace as well as for prevention and redressal of such complaints. “Sexual harassment at the workplace is an affront to the fundamental rights of a woman to equality under Articles 14 and 15 and her right to live with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution as well as her right to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business,” the bench said in its judgement delivered on February 25.
 
The bench said the material placed before it indicated that the woman officer, during her posting at Indore branch of the bank, had written repeated communications to authorities drawing their attention to serious irregularities in maintenance of accounts of liquor contractors and had levelled specific allegations of corruption. “There can be no manner of doubt that the respondent (woman officer) has been victimized. Her reports of irregularities in the branch met with a reprisal. She was transferred out and sent to a branch which was expected to be occupied by a scale-I officer,” the bench said.
 
“This is symptomatic of a carrot and stick policy adopted to suborn the dignity of a woman who is aggrieved by unfair treatment at her workplace. The law cannot countenance this. The order of transfer was an act of unfair treatment and is vitiated by malafides,” it said. The top court noted in its judgement that the woman officer had not participated in the proceedings before the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) of the bank, which dealt with her allegations of sexual harassment, and there was a fundamental defect in the constitution of the ICC. The counsel appearing for the bank had argued before the apex court that the ICC, upon enquiring into the complaint of sexual harassment, had found that there was no substance in those allegations. 

 irrigation projects in State mounts to Rs 1.09 lakh crore as balance costs  : Sanjay Patil

irrigation projects in State mounts to Rs 1.09 lakh crore as balance costs : Sanjay Patil

irrigation projects_1&nbs

Sanjay Patil : Nagpur : As per the latest Governor’s Directives, 123 projects now need Rs 43,560.57 crore for completion. The number of projects needing funds for completion has come down by 11 in one year, but the required amount has increased by Rs 10,439.10 crore. According to officials in the know of things, but wish to remain unnamed, the number of projects getting completed has been a fact in the past years. Though the number of projects requiring funds for completion has come down, the balance cost is rising for a variety of reasons. Some of the reasons, they said, included time overrun resulting in cost overrun. But, the biggest reason behind time overrun has been that the actual availability of funds is much lesser than the requirement for completion of projects.
Besides, some issues regarding prioritisation had affected completion of projects. In fact, the Governor of Maharashtra also has been issuing directives to the State Government for ensuring completion of projects. The Governor had directed previously that projects nearing completion should be given priority as far as funds allocation was concerned. Land acquisition, rehabilitation, net present value charges, and funds required for other clearances should be given priority. Also, there should not be any diversion of funds from one region to the another. This year, too, the Governor has considered the huge balance cost of ongoing irrigation projects and has cautioned about the thin-spreading of resources.
“The work on any new project shall not be started till the State Government is able to make adequate additional resources available to complete these new projects within a defined time-frame, without affecting the availability of funds for the ongoing works. In view of the enormity of the liabilities, these directions shall continue to operate,” the Governor has mentioned in his latest directives issued a few days ago. It will be interesting to watch how the Maharashtra Government decides on prioritisation of irrigation projects, and manages to complete those in the given allocation of resources. Also, it will be interesting to watch whether rainfed region of Vidarbha gets better attention as far as completion of irrigation projects is concerned.


With each passing year, the ‘balance cost’ of irrigation projects in Maharashtra is increasing. As per the latest Governor’s Directives to the State Government for the year 2020-21, the balance cost of irrigation projects in the State as on April 1, 2019 was pegged at a whopping Rs 1,09,390.17 crore. Interestingly, the Governor’s Directives for the year 2019-20 had stated that the balance cost of irrigation projects in Maharashtra was Rs 83,663.77 crore as on April 1, 2018.

irrigation projects chart 
Thus, in one year, it is evident from the Governor’s Directives issued the last year and this year, the balance cost of irrigation projects in the State has increased by a huge Rs 25,726.40 crore. The Governor’s Directives for the year 2019-20 mentioned that there were total 334 irrigation projects in the State that required Rs 83,663.77 crore for completion. Now, the Governor’s Directives for 2020-21 reveal that the number of irrigation projects that need funds for completion has come down to 313, but the cost required for completion has gone up to Rs 1,09,390.17 crore. This reflects that between April 1, 2018 and April 1, 2019, as many as 21 projects got completed. As far as Vidarbha region is concerned, 134 irrigation projects as on April 1, 2018 needed Rs 33,121.47 crore for completion.
рдкрд╛рд▓рдХрдордВрддреНрд░реНрдпрд╛рдВрдЪреА рдореЗрдпреЛ, рдореЗрдбреАрдХрд▓ рдЖрдгрд┐ рд╡рд┐рдорд╛рдирддрд│рд╛рд▓рд╛ рдЖрдХрд╕реНрдорд┐рдХ рднреЗрдЯ:  рдХреЛрд░реЛрдирд╛ рд╕рдВрд╢рдпрд┐рдд  : рд╕рдВрдЬрдп рдкрд╛рдЯреАрд▓

рдкाрд▓рдХрдоंрдд्рд░्рдпांрдЪी рдоेрдпो, рдоेрдбीрдХрд▓ рдЖрдгि рд╡िрдоाрдирддрд│ाрд▓ा рдЖрдХрд╕्рдоिрдХ рднेрдЯ: рдХोрд░ोрдиा рд╕ंрд╢рдпिрдд : рд╕ंрдЬрдп рдкाрдЯीрд▓

...


рд╕ंрдЬрдп рдкाрдЯीрд▓ : рдиाрдЧрдкूрд░ : рдиाрдЧрдкूрд░ рдЬिрд▓्рд╣्рдпाрдд рдХोрд░ोрдиा рд░ुрдЧ्рдгांрдЪी рд╡्рдпрд╡рд╕्рдеा рдпोрдЧ्рдп рдкрдж्рдзрддीрдиे рд╣ोрддे рдХिंрд╡ा рдХрд╕े рдпाрдЪी рдоाрд╣िрддी рдЬाрдгूрди рдШेрдг्рдпाрд╕ाрдаी рдиाрдЧрдкूрд░ рдЬिрд▓्рд╣्рдпाрдЪे рдкाрд▓рдХрдоंрдд्рд░ी рдбॉ. рдиिрддीрди рд░ाрдКрдд рдпांрдиी рдЖрдЬ рдоेрдпो, рдоेрдбिрдХрд▓ рдЖрдгि рд╡िрдоाрдирддрд│ाрд╡рд░ рдк्рд░рдд्рдпрдХ्рд╖ рднेрдЯ рджेрдКрди рддेрдеीрд▓ рд╡्рдпрд╡рд╕्рдеेрдЪा рдЖрдвाрд╡ा рдШेрддрд▓ा. рдкाрд▓рдХрдоंрдд्рд░्рдпांрдЪ्рдпा рдЖрдХрд╕्рдоिрдХ рднेрдЯीрдиे рдЖрд░ोрдЧ्рдп рдк्рд░рд╢ाрд╕рди рд╕рддрд░्рдХ рдЭाрд▓े рдЖрд╣े.

рдпाрдк्рд░рд╕ंрдЧी рдоाрдЬी рдкाрд▓рдХрдоंрдд्рд░ी рд╕рддीрд╢ рдЪрддुрд░्рд╡ेрджी, рдиाрдЧрдкूрд░ рдорд╣ाрдирдЧрд░ рдкाрд▓िрдХा рд╡िрд░ोрдзी рдкрдХ्рд╖ рдиेрддे рддाрдиाрдЬी рд╡рдирд╡े, рдХाँрдЧ्рд░ेрд╕ рдЕрдиुрд╕ूрдЪिрдд рдЬाрддी рд╕рдорди्рд╡рдпрдХ рд░ाрдЬेंрдж्рд░ рдХрд░рд╡ाрдбे рддрд╕ेрдЪ рдоेрдпो рд░ुрдЧ्рдгाрд▓рдпाрдЪे рдЕрдзिрд╖्рдаाрддा рдбॉ. рдЕрдЬрдп рдХेрд╡рд▓ीрдпा рдк्рд░ाрдоुрдЦ्рдпाрдиे рдЙрдкрд╕्рдеिрдд рд╣ोрддे.

рд╕рд░्рд╡рдк्рд░рдердо рдоेрдпो рд░ुрдЧ्рдгाрд▓рдпाрдЪ्рдпा рдЖрдХрд╕्рдоिрдХ рд╡िрднाрдЧाрддीрд▓ рдХрд░्рддрд╡्рдпाрд╡рд░ рдЕрд╕рд▓ेрд▓्рдпा рдбॉрдХ्рдЯрд░ांрд╕ोрдмрдд рдд्рдпांрдиी рдЖрдпрд╕ोрд▓ेрд╢рди рд╡ॉрд░्рдб, рдФрд╖рдз рдЙрдкрд▓рдм्рдзрддा, рдоाрд╕्рдХ рд╕ाрдаा рдЖрдгि рд╡ाрдкрд░рд▓ेрд▓्рдпा рд╡рд╕्рддू рдирд╖्рдЯ рдХрд░рдг्рдпाрдЪ्рдпा рдк्рд░рдХ्рд░िрдпेрдмाрдмрдд рдоाрд╣िрддी рдШेрддрд▓ी. рддрд╕ेрдЪ рд░ुрдЧ्рдгांрдиा рджेрдг्рдпाрдд рдпेрдгाрд▒्рдпा рдЙрдкрдЪाрд░ाрдмाрдмрдд рд╡िрдЪाрд░рдкूрд╕ рдХेрд▓ी. рдд्рдпाрдиंрддрд░ рдоेрдбीрдХрд▓ рд░ुрдЧ्рдгाрд▓рдпाрдЪ्рдпा рдЖрдХрд╕्рдоिрдХ рд╡िрднाрдЧाрд▓ा рднेрдЯ рджेрдКрди рд╕рдж्рдпрд╕्рдеिрддी рдЬाрдгूрди рдШेрддрд▓ी.

рдЖрдЬ рдкाрд╡ेрддो рдПрдХूрдг 33 рд░ुрдЧ्рдгांрдЪी рдЪाрдЪрдгी рдиाрдЧрдкुрд░ाрдд рдХрд░рдг्рдпाрдд рдЖрд▓ी рдЕрд╕ूрди, рдд्рдпाрдордз्рдпे рдоेрдпोрдЪे рддीрди рд░ुрдЧ्рдг рдоेрдбीрдХрд▓рдЪे рддीрди, рдЕрдорд░ाрд╡рддीрдЪा рдПрдХ рд╡ рдЫрдд्рддीрд╕рдЧрдб рд░ाрдЬ्рдпाрддीрд▓ рд╡ीрд╕ рдЖрдгि рдордз्рдпрдк्рд░рджेрд╢ рдпेрдеीрд▓ рд╕рд╣ा рд╕ंрд╢рдпिрдд рд░ुрдЧ्рдгांрдЪा рд╕рдоाрд╡ेрд╢ рдЖрд╣े. 33 рдкैрдХी рдПрдХрд╣ी рд░ुрдЧ्рдг рдкॉрдЭीрдЯिрд╡्рд╣ рдиाрд╣ी. рдХोрд░ोрдиा рд░ुрдЧ्рдгांрдЪी рдЪाрдЪрдгी рдоेрдпो рд░ुрдЧ्рдгाрд▓рдпाрдд рдХрд░рдг्рдпाрдд рдпेрдд рдЕрд╕ूрди рдЪाрдЪрдгीрдХрд░ीрддा рдХिрдоाрди рдкाрдЪ рддे рд╕рд╣ा рддाрд╕ рд▓ाрдЧрдд рдЕрд╕рд▓्рдпाрдЪे рдЕрдзिрд╖्рдаाрддा рдбॉ. рдЕрдЬрдп рдХेрд╡рд▓िрдпा рдпांрдиी рд╕ांрдЧिрддрд▓े.

рдд्рдпाрдиंрддрд░ рдиाрдЧрдкूрд░ рд╡िрдоाрдирддрд│ाрд╡рд░ рднेрдЯ рджेрд╡ूрди рдХрддाрд░, рд╢ाрд░рдЬाрд╣ рдЖрдгि рджुрдмрдИ рдпेрдеीрд▓ рд╡िрджेрд╢ी рдк्рд░рд╡ाрд╢ी рд╡ рдкрд░्рдпрдЯрдХांрдЪ्рдпा рд╕्рдХ्рд░िрдиिंрдЧ рдЪाрдЪрдгीрдмाрдмрдд рдоाрд╣िрддी рдШेрддрд▓ी. рд╡िрдоाрдирддрд│ाрд╡рд░ рдерд░्рдорд▓ рдХॅрдоेрд░ा рд╡ рд╕्рдХॅрдирд░рд╡्рджाрд░े рддрдкाрд╕рдгी рдХрд░рдг्рдпाрдд рдпेрдд рдЕрд╕рд▓्рдпाрдЪे рд╡िрдоाрдирддрд│ рд╡्рдпрд╡рд╕्рдеाрдкрдХ рдиिрдЦीрд▓ рдпाрджрд╡ рдпांрдиी рд╕ांрдЧिрддрд▓े.

Saturday, 7 March 2020

рдХрд╛рдБрдЧреНрд░реЗрд╕ рдкреНрд░рд╡рдХреНрддреЗ рд╕рдЪрд┐рди рд╕рд╛рд╡рдВрдд -'рдпреЗрд╕ рдмрдБрдХ рдШреЛрдЯрд╛рд│реНрдпрд╛рд╕ рдореЛрджреА, рд╢рд╣рд╛ рдЬрдмрд╛рдмрджрд╛рд░'- рд╕рдВрдЬрдп рдкрд╛рдЯреАрд▓

рдХाँрдЧ्рд░ेрд╕ рдк्рд░рд╡рдХ्рддे рд╕рдЪिрди рд╕ाрд╡ंрдд -'рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХ рдШोрдЯाрд│्рдпाрд╕ рдоोрджी, рд╢рд╣ा рдЬрдмाрдмрджाрд░'- рд╕ंрдЬрдп рдкाрдЯीрд▓



 рд╕ंрдЬрдп рдкाрдЯीрд▓: рдоुंрдмрдИ: рдмँрдХांрдиा рдХोрдЯ्рдпрд╡рдзींрдЪा рдЪुрдиा рд▓ाрд╡ूрди рдиीрд░рд╡ рдоोрджी, рдоेрд╣ुрд▓ рдЪोрдХ्рд╕ी, рд╡िрдЬрдп рдорд▓्рд▓्рдпा рд╣े рдкрд│ूрди рдЧेрд▓े рддो рдкैрд╕ाрд╣ी рдпा рджेрд╢ाрддीрд▓ рдмрд╣ुрд╕ंрдЦ्рдп рд╣िंрджूंрдЪाрдЪ рд╣ोрддा. рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрдд резрео рд╣рдЬाрд░ реирейрео рдХрд░्рдордЪाрд░ी рдЕрд╕ूрди, рдпाрдд рд╕рд░्рд╡рдЪ рд╣िंрджू рдЕрд╕ूрди, рдиोрдХрд░ीрд╣ी рдзोрдХ्рдпाрдд рдЖрд▓ी рдЖрд╣े. рдпाрд▓ा рд╕рд░्рд╡рд╕्рд╡ी рдоोрджी рд╕рд░рдХाрд░рдЪ рдЬрдмाрдмрджाрд░ рдЕрд╕рд▓्рдпाрдЪा рдХाँрдЧ्рд░ेрд╕рдЪा рдЖрд░ोрдк рдЖрд╣े. рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрд╡рд░ рдиिрд░्рдмंрдз рдШाрддрд▓्рдпाрдиे рдорд╣ाрд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░ाрддीрд▓ резрежреп рдмँрдХा рдЕрдбрдЪрдгीрдд рдЖрд▓्рдпा рдЕрд╕ूрди рдпाрдд рд╡िрджрд░्рднाрддीрд▓ рдордз्рдпрд╡рд░्рддी рдмँрдХांрд╕рд╣ рдХाрд╣ी рд╕рд╣рдХाрд░ी рдмँрдХा рддрд╕ेрдЪ рдкрддрд╕ंрд╕्рдеांрдЪ्рдпा рдаेрд╡ीрд╣ी рдпाрдЪ рдмँрдХेрдд рд╣ोрдд्рдпा. рдкрд░ंрддु рдмрдбोрджा рдорд╣ाрдкाрд▓िрдХेрдЪ्рдпा рдмрдбोрджा рд╕्рдоाрд░्рдЯ рдбेрд╡्рд╣рд▓рдоेंрдЯ рдХंрдкрдиीрдЪे реиремрел рдХोрдЯी рд░ुрдкрдпे рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрд╡рд░ рдиिрд░्рдмंрдз рдШाрд▓рдг्рдпाрдЪ्рдпा рдПрдХ рджिрд╡рд╕ाрдЖрдзीрдЪ рдХाрдвूрди рдШेрдг्рдпाрдд рдЖрд▓े. рдпाрддूрди рдоोрджी, рд╢рд╣ांрдиा рдлрдХ्рдд рдЧुрдЬрд░ाрддрдЪीрдЪ рдХाрд│рдЬी рдЕрд╕рд▓्рдпाрдЪे рджिрд╕рддे, рдЕрд╕े рд╕ाрд╡ंрдд рдо्рд╣рдгाрд▓े.

рдкिंрдкрд░ी рдЪिंрдЪрд╡рдб рдорд╣ाрдкाрд▓िрдХेрдд рднाрдЬрдкрдЪी рд╕рдд्рддा рдЕрд╕ूрди, рдпा рдорд╣ाрдкाрд▓िрдХेрдЪे репрежрел рдХोрдЯी рд░ु. рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрдд рдЖрд╣ेрдд. рдоोрджी рд╢рд╣ांрдиी рдмрдбोрджा рдорд╣ाрдкाрд▓िрдХेрд╕ाрд░рдЦेрдЪ рдХिрдоाрди рдкिंрдкрд░ी рдЪिंрдЪрд╡рдб рдорд╣ाрдкाрд▓िрдХेрдЪ्рдпा рдХाрдиाрдд рдЬрд░ी рд╕ांрдЧिрддрд▓े рдЕрд╕рддे рддрд░ी рддे рдпा рд╕ंрдХрдЯाрддूрди рд╡ाрдЪрд▓े рдЕрд╕рддे. рдкрдг рдЧुрдЬрд░ाрдд рдк्рд░ेрдоाрдкुрдвे рдд्рдпांрдиा рдЗрддрд░ рдХोрдгी рджिрд╕рдд рдиाрд╣ी рдЕрд╕ेрдЪ рдо्рд╣рдгाрд╡े рд▓ाрдЧрддे, рдЕрд╕ा рдЯोрд▓ाрд╣ी рд╕ाрд╡ंрдд рдпांрдиी рд▓рдЧाрд╡рд▓ा рдЖрд╣े.

рдзрд░्рдоाрдЪ्рдпा рдиाрд╡ाрдЦाрд▓ी рджेрд╢ाрдд рдорддांрдЪे рдЬाрддीрдп рдз्рд░ुрд╡ीрдХрд░рдг рдХрд░рдг्рдпाрд╕ाрдаी рд╣िंрджू рдЦрддрд░े рдоें рд╣ै рдЕрд╕ा рдиाрд░ा рд╕ंрдШ рдкрд░िрд╡ाрд░ाрддीрд▓ рднाрдЬрдк рд╡ рдд्рдпांрдЪ्рдпा рд╕ंрд▓рдЧ्рди рд╕ंрдШрдЯрдиांрдХрдбूрди рд╕рддрдд рджिрд▓ी рдЬाрдд рдЕрд╕рд▓ा рддрд░ी рдоोрджी рдпांрдЪ्рдпा рд░ाрдЬ्рдпाрдд рд╣िंрджूрдЪ рдзोрдХ्рдпाрдд рдЖрд▓्рдпाрдЪी рдкрд░िрд╕्рдеिрддी рдиिрд░्рдоाрдг рдЭाрд▓ी рдЖрд╣े. рджेрд╢ाрдЪ्рдпा рдмँрдХांрдордзीрд▓ рдмрд╣ुрд╕ंрдЦ्рдп рд╣िंрджुрдЪाрдЪ рдкैрд╕ा рдмँрдХांрдд рд╕ुрд░рдХ्рд╖िрдд рди рд░ाрд╣िрд▓्рдпाрдоुрд│े рдЕрдиेрдХ рдХुрдЯुंрдм рдЙрдж्рдзрд╡рд╕्рдд рд╣ोрдд рдЕрд╕ूрди, рдд्рдпाрд╕ рдХेंрдж्рд░ाрддीрд▓ рдоोрджी рд╕рд░рдХाрд░рдЪ рдЬрдмाрдмрджाрд░ рдЕрд╕рд▓्рдпाрдЪा рдЖрд░ोрдк рдорд╣ाрд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░ рдк्рд░рджेрд╢ рдХाँрдЧ्рд░ेрд╕рдиे рд╢рдиिрд╡ाрд░ी рдоुंрдмрдИрдд рдХेрд▓ा рдЖрд╣े. рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрд╡рд░ीрд▓ рдиिрд░्рдмंрдзाрдоुрд│े рдорд╣ाрд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░ाрддीрд▓ резрежреп рдмँрдХा рдЕрдбрдЪрдгीрдд рдЖрд▓्рдпाрдЪा рджाрд╡ा рдХाँрдЧ्рд░ेрд╕рдиे рдХेрд▓ा рдЖрд╣े.

рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрд╡рд░ рд░िрдЭрд░्рд╡्рд╣ рдмँрдХेрдЪ्рдпा рдиिрд░्рдмंрдзाрдоुрд│े рдд्рдпा рдмँрдХेрдд рдаेрд╡рд▓ेрд▓े рдкैрд╕े рдХाрдврдг्рдпाрд╕ाрдаी рд▓ोрдХांрдЪ्рдпा рд░ांрдЧा рд▓ाрдЧрд▓ेрд▓्рдпा рдЖрд╣ेрдд. рдпाрдЖрдзी рдкंрдЬाрдм рдорд╣ाрд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░ рдмँрдХेрддीрд▓ рдШोрдЯाрд│्рдпाрдоुрд│े рдХाрд╣ी рдЧुंрддрд╡рдгूрдХрджाрд░ांрдиा рдк्рд░ाрдг рдЧрдорд╡ाрд╡े рд▓ाрдЧрд▓े. рдиोрдЯрдмंрджीрдЪ्рдпा рдиिрд░्рдгрдпाрдоुрд│े рдХрд░ोрдбो рд▓ोрдХ рд░рд╕्рдд्рдпाрд╡рд░ рдЖрд▓े. рдпाрдд рдЬрд╡рд│рдкाрд╕ рджीрдбрд╢े рд▓ोрдХांрдЪा рдЬीрд╡ рдЧेрд▓ा. рджेрд╢ाрдд рдЖрдд्рдорд╣рдд्рдпा рдХрд░рдгाрд▒्рдпा рддрд░ुрдг рд╡ рд╢ेрддрдХрд░ी рдЖрдд्рдорд╣рдд्рдпांрдордз्рдпेрд╣ी рдмрд╣ुрд╕ंрдЦ्рдп рд╣िंрджूрдЪ рдЖрд╣ेрдд. рдЖрддा рддीрдЪ рд╡ेрд│ рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрдд рдкैрд╕ा рдЕрд╕рд▓ेрд▓्рдпा рд▓ोрдХांрд╡рд░ рдЖрд▓ेрд▓ी рдЖрд╣े, рдЕрд╢ी рдЯीрдХा рдк्рд░рд╡рдХ्рддे рд╕рдЪिрди рд╕ाрд╡ंрдд рдпांрдиी рдХेрд▓ी рдЖрд╣े.

рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрддीрд▓ рд▓ोрдХांрдЪी рдЧुंрддрд╡рдгूрдХ рдзोрдХ्рдпाрдд рдЖрд▓ी рдкрд░ंрддु рдпा рд╕ंрдХрдЯाрдиे рд╣िंрджूंрдЪ्рдпा рджेрд╡ाрд▓ाрд╣ी рд╕ोрдбрд▓े рдиाрд╣ी. рдкुрд░ीрдЪ्рдпा рднрдЧрд╡ाрди рдЬрдЧрди्рдиाрде рдоंрджिрд░ाрдЪे рд╡िрд╡िрдз рд░ाрд╖्рдЯ्рд░ीрдпрдХृрдд рдмँрдХांрдордз्рдпे рдЕрд╕рд▓ेрд▓े релрекрел рдХोрдЯी рд░ुрдкрдпे рдПрдХ рдорд╣िрди्рдпाрдЖрдзी рдпाрдЪ рдпेрд╕ рдмँрдХेрдд рдЬрдоा рдХрд░рдг्рдпाрдд рдЖрд▓े рд╣ोрддे. рддे рдкैрд╕ेрд╣ी рдЖрддा рдмुрдбीрдд рдЭाрд▓्рдпाрддрдЪ рдЬрдоा рдЖрд╣े. рдпाрдд рднрдЧрд╡ाрди рдЬрдЧрди्рдиाрдерд╣ी рд╕ंрдХрдЯाрдд рдЖрд▓्рдпाрдЪा рджाрд╡ा рд╕ाрд╡ंрдд рдпांрдиी рдХेрд▓ा.


Wednesday, 4 March 2020

 ACB strongly opposed multi-crore irrigation scam transfer to CBI ,ED,SFIO : Sanjay Patil

ACB strongly opposed multi-crore irrigation scam transfer to CBI ,ED,SFIO : Sanjay Patil

Image result for dams

Sanjay Patil : Nagpur : THE Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) has strongly defended its ongoing probe into multi-crore irrigation scam and opposed transfer of further investigation to any other agency like Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Directorate of Enforcement (ED), and Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). The investigation is being conducted expeditiously in “transparent, just and fair manner,” the ACB claimed in an affidavit filed before Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court while asserting that enquiries entrusted to ACB shall be done diligently and opposing transfer of probe to other agency as demanded.
The affidavit portraying ongoing investigation as stupendous success has been filed ahead of final hearing before High Court on March 13. The ACB claimed that the special investigation teams at Nagpur and Amravati have always “shown honest endeavour, considering the voluminous documents to be scrutinised, detailed statements to be recorded, information to be gathered so that the investigation/enquiries are taken to logical end in a speedy space.” The affidavit sworn in by Amravati SP (ACB) Shrikant Dhiware claimed that so far SITs have registered 39 criminal offences including 27 at Nagpur ad 12 at Amravati. Interestingly, the ACB claimed that it found no criminal element in many cases but only procedural and administrative irregularities and had recommended departmental action against concerned public servants.
The ACB had recommended departmental probe against 20 Executive Engineers (Nagpur-17, Amravati-03) and 19 divisional account officers attached to the office of the then executive engineers. About the latest cases filed by SIT, the affidavit claimed that in case of Jigaon the chargesheet has been filed against a private contractor on February 24, 2020, but chargesheet against public servants has not been filed due to order of High Court. In case of Raigad and Nimna Pedhi projects, the ACB filed chargesheet against private contractor on March 2. Investigation of irregularities of Waghadi project is over and ACB has sought prosecution sanction from competent authority and forwarded a proposal on February 24.
About the open enquiry conducted by ACB at Amravati region, out of 28 tenders probed, 12 offences have been registered chargesheet has been filed in three offences. In one offence investigation is completed and proposals for prosecution sanction have been sent to the competent authorities of the concerned public servants. Open enquiries of 15 irrigation projects are completed and closed as no criminal offence was disclosed, the ACB claimed. The enquiries are monitored by SPs of Nagpur and Amravati units on day-to-day basis while the Additional Director General (ACB) is supervising and scrutinising the investigations and open enquiries, the ACB claimed. During last hearing held on February 13, the demand of petitioner Atul Jagtap seeking to join CBI, ED, and SFIO was vehemently opposed by respondents including Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar dubbing it as politically motivated.